Systematic Literature Review With Evidence Tables and Traceable Synthesis
Run PRISMA-style biomedical literature reviews with PubMed and PMC search lanes, screening logic, evidence tables, certainty summaries, and durable review artifacts.
Decision questions
What this solution is built to answer.
What does the literature actually support, and where is it weak?
Which studies should be included, excluded, or treated cautiously?
What evidence table can support diligence, regulatory, grant, or strategy work?
Where do conflicting findings change the recommendation?
Capabilities
What ARiDA can run for this use case.
PubMed and PMC search lanes with query discipline.
Screening logic, evidence extraction, and PRISMA-style flow outputs.
Evidence tables and certainty summaries.
Publication critique patterns for methodological quality.
Synthesis into review reports, investment memos, or scientific briefs.
Workflow table
Named workflows and expected artifacts.
| Workflow | Role | Artifacts |
|---|---|---|
| systematic-literature-review | PRISMA-style evidence synthesis | Review report, evidence table, PRISMA diagram, certainty summary |
| literature-search-patterns | Specialist PubMed / PMC query patterns | Search strategies, corpus summaries, PMID verification |
| publication-critique-patterns | Methodological critique | Study limitations, evidence quality, interpretation cautions |
Evidence inputs
Data sources, tools, and user context.
Outputs
What the workflow should leave behind.
Deliverables
Evidence table with source identifiers and extracted fields.
Literature review report with methods, findings, limitations, and implications.
PRISMA-style flow diagram.
Certainty summary and caveat register.
Proof points
The literature specialist has PubMed tools, PMID verification, skill loading, and image analysis.
Evidence tables are designed as reusable inputs for later strategy and valuation work.
The workflow separates corpus gathering from synthesis.
FAQ
Common evaluation questions.
Does ARiDA produce only a narrative review?
The evidence table, search logic, and review artifacts are first-class outputs so later teams can reuse or challenge the synthesis.
Can uploaded papers be included?
Yes. Uploaded PDFs can be restored into the workspace and processed alongside search results when the workflow needs local documents.
Related solutions
Competitive Intelligence
Build competitive landscapes, TPP comparisons, patent-cliff views, market-share scenarios, and response plans from live web, trial, patent, literature, and database evidence.
Clinical Trial Intelligence
Analyze trial landscapes, protocol patterns, endpoints, enrollment signals, sponsor behavior, recent registry changes, and historical AACT structure.
Indication Expansion
Scan, assess, and sequence indication opportunities with scientific rationale, clinical feasibility, competitive density, IP context, market structure, and valuation logic.
Related reading
How to Build a Systematic Literature Review With Evidence Tables
The evidence table makes a serious literature review inspectable, reusable, and harder to overstate.
Why Multi-Agent Is Only Useful If the Work Product Is Durable
Parallel agents matter only when useful work survives the run in a form another professional can inspect and reuse.
Designing AI Research Systems for Biotech: Tools, Workflows, and Durable State
Biotech research systems need workflow structure, specialist lanes, files, and repeatable execution paths around the model.